Figure 1. Migrated multichannel seismic reflection profile Lusigal 12 across Site 898 at SP 3126 (see Fig. 2 for location). Thin vertical line indicates the location and proposed penetration of the borehole; thick line indicates the penetration achieved. The enhanced lines on the section indicate boundaries between acoustic formations 1A, 1B, and 2, defined by Groupe Galice (1979) (see "Integration of Seismic Profiles with Observations from the Site" section, this chapter). The angular unconformity between acoustic formations 1A and 1B is described in the text. Vertical exaggeration is about 4:1.

Figure 1. Migrated multichannel seismic reflection profile Lusigal 12 across Site 898 at SP 3126 (see Fig. 2 for location). Thin vertical line indicates the location and proposed penetration of the borehole; thick line indicates the penetration achieved. The enhanced lines on the section indicate boundaries between acoustic formations 1A, 1B, and 2, defined by Groupe Galice (1979) (see "Integration of Seismic Profiles with Observations from the Site" section, this chapter). The angular unconformity between acoustic formations 1A and 1B is described in the text. Vertical exaggeration is about 4:1.