RESULTS

Samples from both Site 969 and Site 974 revealed clear correlations between the three measured parameters: percent organic carbon, 13Corg, and 15N. Sapropel intervals of increased organic carbon content were marked by lighter 15N values and almost always by heavier 13C values. Table 2 and Table 3 provide compositional and isotopic data for each sample; Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, and Figure 5 show data from representative sapropels and their surrounding sediments.

Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Concentrations

At Site 969, organic carbon content averaged 0.48% (standard deviation [S.D.] = 0.35%) during normal sedimentation and 4.69% (S.D. = 2.63%) during sapropel formation, with no consistent trends downcore. Sapropel values ranged from 2.5% to 9.2% organic carbon. Two exceptions were sapropels A1 and A5, which showed no elevation in organic carbon content despite being identified as sapropels (Shipboard Scientific Party, 1996a).

At Site 974, the organic carbon gradient between sapropel and background intervals was less pronounced, with sapropels averaging 1.61% (S.D. = 0.42%) organic carbon and surrounding sediments averaging 0.51% (S.D. = 0.19%). No downcore trends were apparent in either the sapropels or the background sediments.

Nitrogen was one to two orders of magnitude less abundant than carbon in all samples. Nonsapropel values averaged 0.018% (S.D. = 0.007%) at Site 969 and 0.030% (S.D. = 0.010%) at Site 974 while sapropel values averaged 0.179% (S.D. = 0.095%) at Site 969 and 0.088% (S.D. = 0.022%) at Site 974. Within sapropel intervals, nitrogen increased in approximate proportion to carbon, so that the C:N ratio did not change significantly across sapropel boundaries.

Nitrogen Isotope Ratios

At Site 969, 15N averaged 3.5 (S.D. = 1.5) in background sediments, 0.2 (S.D. = 1.5) in sapropels, and 15N (15Nsapropel - 15Nbackground) ranged from +0.45 to-6.79. Although the mean 15N varied little from sapropel to sapropel, we found relatively large variations in 15N within narrow stratigraphic zones within the sapropels. At Site 974, 15N averaged 5.0 (S.D. = 0.6) in background sediments and 2.2 (S.D. = 0.8) in sapropels, and 15N ranged from -2.80 to-3.08.

Compared to these values, the data of Calvert et al. (1992) from the eastern Mediterranean are markedly enriched in 15N during background sedimentation (average 15N +6) and somewhat enriched during sapropel sedimentation (average 15N +1 to +3).

Carbon Isotope Ratios

At Site 969, 13C averaged -24.7 in normal sediments, with considerable variation through the sediment column (S.D. = 1.9). However, within any single stratigraphic zone, 13C values were relatively constant. Sapropel 13C did not vary greatly, with an average value of -23.1 (S.D. = 0.97). The resulting average difference in 13C between sapropel and background sediments (13C = 13Csapropel - 13Cbackground) was 1.60, a highly significant difference (single-factor ANOVA, p < 0.05). Variations in 13Cbackground through the sediment column led to 13C values ranging from 4.44 in sapropel A7 to -1.40 in sapropel S1; in three sapropels (S1, S6 and S8), 13Csapropel was actually more negative than 13Cbackground.

The 13C trends were more consistent at Site 974, where the 13C of background sediments averaged -25.8 (S.D. = 1.0) and the 13C of sapropels averaged -24.5 (S.D. = 0.67). The 13C offset at this site varied between 0.98 and 1.66, with a mean of 1.32, a statistically significant difference (single-factor ANOVA, p < 0.05).

Virtually all samples at both sites contained less 13C than the eastern Mediterranean samples analyzed by Fontugne and Calvert (1992), which had a mean 13C of -18.8 ± 1.07 for nonsapropels and -21.0 ± 0.82 for sapropels. Furthermore, at Sites 969 and 974, 13C generally increased during sapropel intervals, whereas in sediments studied by Fontugne and Calvert (1992), 13C decreased during sapropel intervals.

Intersite Comparisons

A comparison of Sites 974, 969, and MD 84641 reveals a consistent east-west 13C gradient and spatially inconsistent trends in 15N and percent organic carbon. Table 4 presents average values of these parameters from the three sites, and Table 5 and Table 6 show east-west 13C and 15N gradients including data from other sites.

One-way ANOVAs were performed to determine the statistical significance of isotope differences between Sites 969 and 974. The 13C of organic matter was significantly lower at Site 974 than at Site 969 for both sapropel intervals (p < 0.05, F = 32.7) and background intervals (p < 0.05, F = 13.5). However, 13C was essentially the same in both cores (p = 0.81; F = 0.06).

The difference in 15N between Sites 969 and 974 was highly significant for both background (p < 0.05, F = 40.9) and sapropel (p < 0.05, F = 27.8) sediments, with Site 974 averaging 1.8 heavier than Site 969. However, 15N was virtually identical (p = 0.99, F < 0.001) between the two sites, with an average value of about -3.

The contrast in organic carbon content between sapropel layers and nonsapropel layers was more dramatic at Site 969 (enrichment factor 10) than at Site 974 (enrichment factor 3) (p < 0.05, F = 5.7).

NEXT