Figures F1-F15
Tables
1-4
F1. FMS log and core data, Hole 856H.
F2. Cross section of the active TAG hydrothermal mound.
F3. Permeability as a function of confining pressure.
F4. Correlation between log permeability and log porosity
F5. Comparison between grain density and permeability.
F6. Permeability anisotropy measurements.
F7. Formation factor as a function of confining pressure.
F8. Permeability and formation factor as a function of confining pressure.
F9. Formation factor and frequency obtained with method 2.
F10. Formation factor and grain density as a function of frequency.
F11. Relationship between sample and fluid conductivities.
F12. Resistivity measurements using methods 1 and 2.
F13. Thermal conductivity variations as a function of grain density.
F14. Thermal conductivity, divided-bar vs. half-space needle-probe method.
F15. Permeability vs. depth profile for different lithologies.
T1. Index properties and thermal conductivities.
T2. Formation factor, resistivity, and permeability.
T3. Comparison of thermal conductivity measurements.
T4. Formation factor and resistivity vs. conductivity.
