Figure F9. The magnetostratigraphy of Site 1095 based on paleomagnetic inclination data and downhole magnetic logging data. The inclination data are from split-core sections (after 20- to 30-mT demagnetization), U-channel samples (PCA = directions estimated from principal component analysis), and discrete samples (PCA). The magnetic logging data, represented by the remanent anomaly, are from the second pass of the GHMT logging tool in Hole 1095B. The interpreted magnetostratigraphy is also compared with the polarity zonation predicted from the geomagnetic polarity timescale (GPTS) for the case where the sedimentation rates are constant over long periods of time. * = excursions, cryptochrons, or anomalous polarity zones observed in the inclination data, # = chrons and subchrons not identified in the sedimentary section.

Figure F9. The magnetostratigraphy of Site 1095 based on paleomagnetic inclination data and downhole magnetic logging data. The inclination data are from split-core sections (after 20- to 30-mT demagnetization), U-channel samples (PCA = directions estimated from principal component analysis), and discrete samples (PCA). The magnetic logging data, represented by the remanent anomaly, are from the second pass of the GHMT logging tool in Hole 1095B. The interpreted magnetostratigraphy is also compared with the polarity zonation predicted from the geomagnetic polarity timescale (GPTS) for the case where the sedimentation rates are constant over long periods of time. * = excursions, cryptochrons, or anomalous polarity zones observed in the inclination data, # = chrons and subchrons not identified in the sedimentary section.