Figure F19. The magnetostratigraphy of Site 1101 is shown with the paleomagnetic inclination data from split-core sections (after demagnetization at 30 mT), U-channel samples (PCA), and discrete samples (PCA). Our interpreted magnetostratigraphy is compared with the polarity zonation predicted from the geomagnetic polarity timescale (GPTS) for the case where the sedimentation rate was constant and for the case where the sediment ages are constrained by diatom, radiolarian, and calcareous nannofossil events of Iwai et al. (Chap. 36, this volume). # = chrons and subchrons not identified in the sedimentary section.

Figure F19. The magnetostratigraphy of Site 1101 is shown with the paleomagnetic inclination data from split-core sections (after demagnetization at 30 mT), U-channel samples (PCA), and discrete samples (PCA). Our interpreted magnetostratigraphy is compared with the polarity zonation predicted from the geomagnetic polarity timescale (GPTS) for the case where the sedimentation rate was constant and for the case where the sediment ages are constrained by diatom, radiolarian, and calcareous nannofossil events of Iwai et al. (Chap. 36, this volume). # = chrons and subchrons not identified in the sedimentary section.