Figure F8. A. Schematic showing potential stratigraphic correlation between Holes 735B and 1105A. Initial correlation was based on similar magnetic susceptibility peak at depth 38.4 mbsf in Hole 1105A data and 212.5 mbsf in Hole 735B data. B. Comparison of magnetic susceptibilities between Holes 735B and 1105A. Unit IV of Hole 735B has high magnetic susceptibility, corresponding to oxide gabbros. This layer compares well in susceptibility and lithology to Subunits IIA and IIB of Hole 1105A. Small central diagram of Hole 1105A represents results at the same vertical scale as those of Hole 735B. The regional inclination (or apparent dip) of the oxide-rich zone, if correlatable, is ~10° along a line between the two holes.

Figure F8. A. Schematic showing potential stratigraphic correlation between Holes 735B and 1105A. Initial correlation was based on similar magnetic susceptibility peak at depth 38.4 mbsf in Hole 1105A data and 212.5 mbsf in Hole 735B data. B. Comparison of magnetic susceptibilities between Holes 735B and 1105A. Unit IV of Hole 735B has high magnetic susceptibility, corresponding to oxide gabbros. This layer compares well in susceptibility and lithology to Subunits IIA and IIB of Hole 1105A. Small central diagram of Hole 1105A represents results at the same vertical scale as those of Hole 735B. The regional inclination (or apparent dip) of the oxide-rich zone, if correlatable, is ~10° along a line between the two holes.