BIOSTRATIGRAPHY

Introduction

During Leg 191, calcareous nannofossils, foraminifers, palynomorphs, and radiolarians were studied in order to assess biostratigraphic constraints on the sedimentary section at Site 1179. The reference time scale adopted for Leg 191 follows Gradstein et al. (1994, 1995) for the Cretaceous and Berggren et al. (1995a) for the Cenozoic. Specific biozonations for each fossil group are discussed below in more detail.

Calcareous Nannofossils

We referred primarily to the zonations of Okada and Bukry (1980) and Martini (1971) for Cenozoic sediments and Perch-Nielsen (1983) for Cretaceous sediments. To facilitate comparison with other studies, numerical ages used are those compiled by Berggren et al. (1995a). Calcareous nannofossil assemblages were described from smear slides prepared for each core-catcher sample and for as many additional core samples as time permitted. Standard preparation techniques were used throughout. Examination was performed exclusively with a light microscope, using whatever optical configuration yielded useful results. In all cases, a magnification of 1000× was used to make semiquantitative estimates of abundances. Abundances of individual species were estimated for each sample. Five levels of individual species abundance were recorded, with the following approximate definitions:

R = rare (1 specimen per 51 or more fields of view).
F = few (1 specimen per 11-50 fields of view).
C = common (1 specimen per 2-10 fields of view).
A = abundant (1-10 specimens per field of view).
V = very abundant (>10 specimens per field of view).

Total abundance of calcareous nannofossils for each sample was estimated as follows:

B = barren (none).
R = rare (1-10 specimens per 500 fields of view, about three traverses).
F = few (11-50 specimens per 500 fields of view).
C = common (51-2000 specimens per 500 fields of view).
A = abundant (2001-20,000 specimens per 500 fields of view).
V = very abundant (>20,000 specimens per 500 fields of view).

The qualitative evaluation of the preservation of calcareous nannofossils was recorded as poor, moderate, or good. These categories represent subjective impressions according to the following definitions:

P = poor. Severe dissolution, fragmentation, and/or overgrowth has occurred. Primary features may have been destroyed, and many specimens cannot be identified to the species level.
M = moderate. Dissolution and/or overgrowth are evident. A significant proportion (up to 10%) of the specimens cannot be identified to species level with absolute certainty.
G = good. There is little or no evidence of dissolution and/or overgrowth. Diagnostic characteristics are preserved, and nearly all specimens can be identified to species level.

Dinoflagellate Cysts

No widely accepted dinocyst zonation exists for the Neogene to Holocene, but ages for these sediments are based mainly on the dinocyst biozonations of Powell (1992) and Harland (1992), which are derived largely from western Europe. The work of Matsuoka (1983) on late Cenozoic dinoflagellates and acritarchs in central Japan proved to be extremely useful at this western North Pacific site. Our Pleistocene biostratigraphy is supplemented by the zonation developed for the midlatitude North Atlantic by McCarthy et al. (2000). The Northern Hemisphere composite range estimates for Mesozoic-Cenozoic strata of Williams et al. (1993) and dinocyst datums established in various Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) and ODP holes (e.g., de Verteuil, 1996; McCarthy and Mudie, 1996; Mudie, 1987) were also used to determine ages.

As many 20-cm3 core-catcher samples were examined as time permitted. Additional 20-cm3 samples were examined from intervals of particular stratigraphic interest. Processing consisted of heating the sample in a 1% Calgon solution until clays were disaggregated followed by sieving through a 10-µm Nitex nylon sieve. Residues were then digested in hot 10% hydrochloric acid and washed with distilled water. Because of high silica content, samples were digested for ~1 hr in hot concentrated hydrofluoric acid and again washed with water. This was followed by a second sieving through a 10-µm Nitex nylon sieve. Swirling the organic residues in a large watchglass removed residual coarse silicates, sulfides, and detrital minerals when they were present. Residues were strew mounted in glycerine jelly on glass slides and examined in bright field transmitted light at 250-400× magnification. Absolute abundances (or concentrations) of dinocysts and terrestrial palynomorphs (pollen and spores) were estimated and are reported as cysts per cubic centimeter of sediment. Samples were spiked with a tablet containing a known quantity of Lycopodium clavatum spores following the method of Stockmarr (1971) to determine absolute palynomorph concentrations. Relative species abundances are reported as follows:

R = rare (<3%).
F = few (3%-15%).
C = common (15%-30%).
A = abundant (>30%).

Qualitative evaluation of the preservation of dinocysts only is recorded as poor, moderate, or good. These categories represent subjective impressions with approximately the following meaning:

P = poor. Severe bacterial infestation, chemical oxidation, and/or mechanical fragmentation have occurred. Primary features were destroyed, and many specimens cannot be identified to the species level.
M = moderate. Bacterial infestation, chemical oxidation, and/or mechanical fragmentation are evident. Up to 25% of the specimens cannot be identified to species level with certainty.
G = good. Little or no evidence exists of bacterial infestation, chemical oxidation, or mechanical fragmentation; essentially all (>95%) specimens can be identified to the species level.

All assemblages recovered are thermally immature, and therefore, thermal alteration is not a relevant factor in fragmentation or color alteration of palynomorphs.

Foraminifers

Samples of ~25 mL were soaked in a Calgon solution, washed through a 63-µm sieve, and dried under a heat lamp.

Benthic and planktonic foraminifers were examined from the >150-µm size fraction. Species abundance relative to the total foraminifer fauna was estimated as follows:

B = barren (none).
R = rare (<1%).
F = few (1%-4%).
C = common (5%-20%).
A = abundant (>20%).

Preservation characteristics were divided into four categories:

P = poor (almost all specimens were dissolved or broken and fragments dominated).
M = moderate (30%-60% of specimens showed dissolved or broken chambers).
G = good (60%-90% of specimens were well preserved and unbroken).
VG = very good (>90% of specimens were well preserved and unbroken).

The foraminifers were used primarily as carbonate preservation indicators. For identification, Loeblich and Tappan (1988) was used.

Radiolarians

To obtain radiolarians from CC samples, ~10 cm3 of sediment was disaggregated and boiled using 10% H2O2, 10% HCl, and ~1% Calgon solutions. Brief treatment of samples in an ultrasonic bath was followed by washing on a 63-µm mesh sieve. The residue was moved into a beaker, and a strewn slide was made using a pipette. Canada balsam was used as a mounting medium. Additional random strewn slides will be prepared onshore to locate biostratigraphic events more accurately within cores. Overall radiolarian abundance was determined based on strewn-slide evaluation at 100× using the following conventions:

B = barren (no radiolarians in sample).
T = trace (<1 specimen per traverse).
R = rare (1-10 specimens per traverse).
F = few (11-50 specimens per traverse).
C = common (51-100 specimens per traverse).
A = abundant (>100 specimens per traverse).

The abundance of individual species was recorded relative to the fraction of the total assemblage as follows:

B = barren (absent).
T = trace (present in slide).
R = rare (a few or more specimens per slide).
F = few (<5% of the total assemblage).
C = common (5%-10% of the total assemblage).
A = abundant (>10% of the total assemblage).

Preservation was recorded as follows:

P = poor (strong dissolution, recrystallization, or breakage; many specimens unidentifiable).
M = moderate (minor but common dissolution with a small amount of recrystallization or breakage of specimens).
G = good (majority of specimens complete with minor dissolution, recrystallization, and/or breakage).
E = excellent (nearly pristine complete skeleton lacking any indication of dissolution, recrystallization, or breakage).

NEXT