Figure F26. Depth offset between Holes 1195A and 1195B estimated from (A, B) magnetic susceptibility and (C, D) natural gamma radiation data for the interval 0-150 mbsf. The correspondence of the NGR peak at 36 mbsf suggests minimal offset between the two holes. However, the correspondence is not as good for the magnetic susceptibility data (e.g., the interval at 27-30 mbsf in Hole 1195B that does not seem to exist in Hole 1195A).

Figure F26. Depth offset between Holes 1195A and 1195B estimated from (A, B) magnetic susceptibility and (C, D) natural gamma radiation data for the interval 0-150 mbsf. The correspondence of the NGR peak at 36 mbsf suggests minimal offset between the two holes. However, the correspondence is not as good for the magnetic susceptibility data (e.g., the interval at 27-30 mbsf in Hole 1195B that does not seem to exist in Hole 1195A).