MG/CA PALEOTHERMOMETRY

Mg/Ca is an independent paleotemperature proxy that is measured on the same biotic carrier as 18O, which allows reconstruction of 18Owater and salinity variations without the problems introduced by other temperature proxies like different seasonal signals or different habitat depths of the biotic carriers (Nürnberg, 2000; Lea et al., 2002; Schmidt et al., 2004). Although Mg/Ca paleothermometry is well established for the last glacial–interglacial cycles, few SSTMg/Ca high-resolution records yet exist for older time periods (Tripati et al., 2003; Shevenell et al., 2004; Ravelo et al., 2006). Here, we present a high-resolution (<5 k.y./sample) Mg/Ca record for the early Pliocene, covering 2.4 m.y.

The application of Mg/Ca paleothermometry to Pliocene sample material demands consideration of possible changes in Mg/Caseawater . Brown (1996) showed in a cultivating experiment that a linear dependence between Mg/Casolution and Mg/Caforam exists (0.1 mol/mol change in Mg/Caseawater leads to 0.059 mmol/mol change in Mg/Caforam). Recently, Ries (2004) showed that several carbonate-building organisms display an exponential relationship between Mg/Caorganism and Mg/Casolution. The residence time of Mg in seawater is ~13 m.y. (Broecker and Peng, 1982), which suggests that paleo-SST reconstructions on shorter timescales would not be affected by a change in Mg/Caseawater . However, concentrations of Mg and Ca in seawater may be affected by several factors, including varying continental weathering rates (Berner et al., 1983; Wilkinson and Algeo, 1989), hydrothermal alteration of basalt at mid-ocean ridges (Mottl and Wheat, 1994; Elderfield and Schultz, 1996), carbonate deposition (Wilkinson and Algeo, 1989), and ion exchange reactions of Mg with clays (Gieskes and Lawrence, 1981). Several models that have attempted to reconstruct the Mg/Ca ratio of Cenozoic seawater suggest lower Mg/Caseawater values than today (Wilkinson and Algeo, 1989; Stanley and Hardie, 1998).

Based on the models of Wilkinson and Algeo (1989) and Stanley and Hardie (1998), we assume a maximum lowering of 0.4 mol/mol in Mg/Caseawater for the Pliocene time interval from 4.8 to 2.4 Ma. Applying the relationship of Brown (1996) between Mg/Caseawater and Mg/Caforam, this implies a maximum underestimation of our SSTs by 0.7°–1.0°C. Because this constant offset is within the error estimation for the SST reconstruction, we consider the Pliocene reduction in Mg/Caseawater to be of minor importance.

NEXT