The Eocene had the most equitable climate of the Cenozoic (Dawson et al., 1976; Shackleton and Boersma, 1981; Axelrod, 1984; Rea et al., 1990). Isotopic data suggest that both surface waters and deep waters reached their maximum temperatures in the early Eocene (Savin, 1977; Miller et al., 1987; Stott and Kennett, 1990). High latitudes were substantially warmer than present and reached temperatures of 15º-17ºC (Zachos et al., 1994). This warm interval lasted 3-4 m.y. and marked fundamentally different climate conditions than were present at any other time in the Cenozoic. Latitudinal thermal gradients were probably less than 6º-8ºC during the Eocene, about one-half the modern pole-to-equator gradient (Zachos et al., 1994). Yet the interval is poorly known both because low-latitude records are rare and those that do exist are either spot cored or disturbed by drilling through Eocene cherts (Stott and Zachos, 1991).
High global temperatures in the early Eocene promise a means to test GCMs run under conditions of increased atmospheric CO2 (Popp et al., 1989; Berner, 1990). Knowledge of low-latitude temperatures provides a major constraint on GCMs because equatorial seas play a major role in regulating heat exchange with the atmosphere (Barron and Washington, 1982). It is possible that the relatively equitable Eocene climates were promoted by higher heat transport between latitudes (Covey and Barron, 1988). Hence, low-latitude temperature data are needed to constrain Paleocene climate models. More generally, the Eocene warm interval provides a test for climate models that integrate latitudinal thermal gradients, atmospheric CO2 levels, and ocean-atmosphere heat transport.
Drilling on the Blake Plateau will provide an opportunity to study each of these issues. The plateau was located on the western gateway from the relatively restricted Tethys/Atlantic basins to the open Pacific during the early Paleogene. Comparisons between Caribbean and existing equatorial Pacific sites could show whether deep waters aged as they entered the Pacific as expected if the Tethys was a major source of saline bottom waters. Existing records from the Caribbean (DSDP Site 152) and Central Pacific (DSDP Site 577; ODP Site 865) provide some of the few low-latitude temperature estimates for the Eocene. However, more complete temperature records are needed to document surface-water temperatures in the Eocene tropics and subtropics.
Late Paleocene Event
There is increasing evidence for a short-lived increase in global temperatures in the late Paleocene. The late Paleocene thermal maximum coincides with an abrupt extinction of benthic foraminifers and a marked excursion in the isotopic chemistry of both benthic and planktonic foraminifers. There is good evidence that production of Antarctic Deep Water may have been shut down at this time and deep waters may have originated at low latitudes (Kennett and Stott, 1990; Pak and Miller, 1992).
Stable isotope evidence suggests that the latest Paleocene event was a brief exception to the general formation of deep waters adjacent to Antarctica (Miller et al., 1987). The Southern Ocean has consistently had some of the youngest waters found in the deep sea since at least the Late Cretaceous (Barrera and Huber, 1990, 1991; Pak and Miller, 1992; Zachos et al., 1992). However, the stable isotope data are strongly biased toward studies of high southern latitude cores and cannot eliminate the possibility that there may have been other sources of deep or intermediate water. Indeed, marked reductions in the 13 C latitudinal gradient suggest that there may have been either extremely low rates of surface-water production or other sources of deep waters during the late Paleocene and late early Eocene. Hence, drill sites located near the ends of the Tethys seaway are needed to monitor the possible contribution of deep waters from the low latitudes and to monitor the biological effects of the latest Paleocene thermal maximum.
Leg 171B drilling will provide the opportunity to study the latest Paleocene extinction event at relatively low latitudes as well as provide the first continuous early Eocene Atlantic record of the benthic foraminifer repopulation after this extinction. Paleocene benthic foraminifer faunas were relatively uniform across a wide paleodepth, while Eocene assemblages are much more distinct at different depths. Depth-dependent changes in benthic foraminifer assemblages will provide critical data for interpretation of changes in the structure and sources of deep waters throughout the Paleogene.
The Report of the Second Conference on Scientific Ocean Drilling (COSOD II) recommends that recovery and analysis of sections penetrating the Cretaceous/Paleogene (K/P) boundary should be given high priority by the Ocean Drilling Program. Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary beds are typically thin in the deep sea, yet they contain our best evidence for the geographic distribution and magnitude of the extinctions and the subsequent recovery of the biosphere.
Recent evidence of the impact of a bolide on the Yucatan Platform has focused debate over the history and consequences of this Cretaceous-Paleogene event. Evidence of an impact in the Caribbean includes discoveries of glass spherules and shocked quartz in boundary sections at Haiti and Mimbral, as well as gravity measurements and drill core data that imply the existence of a 180-km-diameter structure of Maastrichtian-earliest Paleocene age beneath the Yucatan (Sigurdsson et al., 1991a, 1991b; Margolis et al., 1991; Alvarez et al., 1991; Hildebrand and Boynton, 1990). Reanalysis of DSDP Sites 536 and 540 in the Gulf of Mexico has led to the discovery of thick deposits of reworked carbonates of diverse ages. These deposits contain upper Maastrichtian nannofossils and occur immediately below lowest Paleocene sediments. Alvarez et al. (1991) have interpreted these K/P boundary deposits as part of the ejecta blanket.
Objectives of K/P boundary drilling on the Blake Plateau include the recovery of a detailed record of the events immediately following the impact such as the sequence of ejecta fallout and settling of the dust cloud. DSDP Hole 390A contains foraminiferal markers for the earliest Paleocene P-alpha zone and the latest Maastrichtian nannofossil zones suggesting the section may be biostratigraphically complete (Gradstein et al., 1978). Unfortunately, rotary drilling of this hole extensively mixed the soft ooze, making recovery of a detailed record of K/P boundary events impossible. Modern piston and extended core barrel (XCB) coring technology should produce better recovery and less disturbed core than were obtained from Hole 390A.
Specific objectives include the following:
To 171B Table of Contents