Figure and table thumbnails

F1. Magnetic susceptibility records from Site 1090 plotted at mbsf and mcd scales, p. 35.

F2. Spliced magnetic susceptibility record from Site 1090, p. 36.

F3. Example of a core description form (barrel sheet) used to describe sediment cores, p. 37.

F4. Key to lithologic, disturbance, structure, fossil, and bioturbation symbols used in the core description forms, p. 38.

F5. Linear regression between opal weight percentages and XRD counts, p. 39.

F6. Biostratigraphic zonal schemes tied to the geomagnetic polarity time scale, and age assignments, p. 40.

T1. Calcareous nannofossil datums used during Leg 177 and their assigned age estimates, p. 49.

F7. Geomagnetic polarity time scale, biostratigraphic zonations, and selected datums used, p. 41.

T2. Planktic foraminifer Subantarctic zonal scheme (Jenkins and Srinivasan, 1986), p.  51.

F8. Number of benthic foraminifer species identified vs. number of specimens counted, p. 43.

F9. Diatom zonation and stratigraphic ranges of diatom species, p. 44.

T3. Age assignments of biostratigraphic diatom zones used during Leg 177, p. 52.

T4. Compilation of diatom species ranges, p. 53.

T5. Ages of biostratigraphically useful radiolarian datums calibrated to the Berggren et al. (1995b) geomagnetic polarity time scale, p. 55.

F10. Control measurements of NGR emission at Sites 1092 and 1093, p. 45.

T6. Control measurements of thermal conductivity in red rubber, p. 56.

F11. Comparison between oven drying and freeze-drying of samples, p.  46.

F12. Intercalibration between the OSU-SCAT and Minolta CM-2002 spectrophotometers, p. 47.

F13. Schematic diagram of the landing board on the OSU-SCAT’s integration sphere, p. 48.

T7. Specifications of the downhole tools deployed during Leg 177, p. 57.