Figure 3. Local survey track of video/sonar coverage at Site 735 showing the distribution of rock
outcrop vs. sediment cover. Ratio of rock outcrop to sediment is proportional to distribution of
patterns. Axes are in meters distance from Beacon 1 and time is annotated. Leg 118 drill hole
locations and bathymetry (5 m contour interval, based on drill pipe measurements) are also shown.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of water hammer drill-in casing system deployment. A. Initial
deployment. B. Spud hole and drill ahead. C. Disengage hydraulic hammer and circulate fluid. D.
Install free-fall reentry funnel. E. Retract bit and release casing running tool. F. Recover hammer
drill and leave a cased reentry hole on the seafloor.
Figure 5. Site map in the Eastern Indian Ocean showing the location of Ninetyeast Ridge and
NERO primary Site 757 and alternate Site 756 (from Peirce, Weissel, et al., 1989).
Figure 6. Sketch of the OFM/SISMOBS experiment (April-May 1992). OFM = Observitoire Fond de Mer (ocean bottom seismometer). OFP = Observitoire Fond de Puits (borehole seismometer).
Figure 7. Location of Federation of Digital Seismic Networks (FDSN) and GEOSCOPE stations in the world as of 1996.
Figure 8. Tomographic model AUM for depth = 100 km (from Montagner and Tanimoto, 1991). Triangles show existing broadband GEOSCOPE stations. Diamonds are proposed drilling sites.
Figure 9. Focal mechanisms of earthquakes that occurred in the Indian Ocean during the last 15 yr (from the Harvard database). It can be noted that the Australo-Indian plate is characterized by a high intraplate seismicity.
Figure 10. Survey tracks and bathymetric chart of the Site 757 operations area (after Shipboard Scientific Party, 1989b). Dashed line indicates survey track conducted during cruise 2707 of the Robert D. Conrad. Solid line indicates survey track of the JOIDES Resolution for ODP Leg 121.
Figure 11. Seismic dip line across the primary Site 757. A. Shipboard analog record, uninterpreted on left and interpreted on right. B. Same line reprocessed postcruise with less vertical exaggeration. The seismic units are discussed in the "Seismic Stratigraphy" section, Leg 121 Initial Reports (Shipboard Scientific Party, 1989c).
Figure 12. Seismic strike line across Site 757. A. Shipboard analog record, uninterpreted on left and interpreted on right. B. Same line reprocessed postcruise with less vertical exaggeration (after Shipboard Scientific Party, 1989c).
Figure 13. Bathymetric chart of the alternate Site 756 operations area (after Shipboard Scientific Party, 1989b). Dashed line indicates survey track conducted during cruise 2708 of the Robert D. Conrad, reference shotpoints are noted as tickmarks along the track line. Solid line indicates survey track of the JOIDES Resolution for ODP Leg 121.
Figure 14. Seismic profile of a proposed location for alternate Site 756. The seismic units are discussed in the "Seismic Stratigraphy" section, Leg 121 Initial Reports (Shipboard Scientific Party, 1989b).